SAEED ZAFAR versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 (2) Corruption Prevention Act (11 of 1947), Section 5 (2) Sanctions (XLV of 1860), Section 409 Bail, Grant of the accused, who was a C Section P officer. , Was behind. For more than the last five months, the investigation was still incomplete and it could not have proceeded without the arrest of the five accomplices, who were investigated by the investigating officer to ensure that the major accused could not be detained indefinitely. No convincing evidence was shown. During his official assignment, the accused had allotted fake persons for his own personal wrongful advantage. The accused was unlikely to falsify or tamper with prosecution evidence and his detention in prison could not serve any purpose. An inquiry was launched against the accused and recommended by the Anti-Corruption authorities to dismiss the case. Further investigation into the case of the accused is required as per section 497 (2), CCPC d according to which it was admitted on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Doltala lawyer