Find a Lawyer

SARDAR BIBI versus HAMEED

Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. XVIII, Rr 5, 8 & S: 115 Seeks evidence of recording evidence by the suit court official in favor of the trial court's decision and in favor of the plaintiff. Was an order passed by. The appellate court set aside and the case was remanded to the trial court on the ground that the evidence before the trial court, headed by the parties, was not recorded by the presiding officer, but the court reader submitted the evidence to the parties. The evidence recorded was recorded by a court official. In the presence of a Presiding Officer of the court, the two sides examined each other's witnesses through their counsel; the councils of the parties signed the order sheet indicating improvement in the proceedings, no such matter before the trial court at the end of the evidence. The objection was not taken, nor was the case in the last phase arguing with the First Appellate Court aggravating and even during the arguments, it was not the ground for the move. The memorandum was raised by the appellant and the defendants when the trial court decided against it, there was no prejudice by any of the parties; in the circumstances, it was somewhat unnecessary and the result was merely a copy of it. That was not possible. The purpose of the Code of Conduct for Civil Procedure, which was intended to proceed because of the issue of justice, was not such a breach or infringement, as the appellate court's decision under the Appellate Court was set aside by the High Court in the amendment exercise. Was. Scope online advocate from Sarai Alamgir lawyer