REHMAT KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P.
Border Services Tribunals Act 1974 Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Government employees were appointed as Junior Clerk after regular regular Government employees claim that they succeeded in the staff training institute Has completed training with. He was performing duties to the satisfaction of his superiors when, after a long time, he was dismissed from the job saying that his appointments were found to be illegal, and against the rules. The decision of the tribunal will be made after considering each individual applicant's case. The service tribunal did not deal with the appeals individually, but rather disposed of the appeals in a resolved manner by violating the Supreme Court's remand order of the Supreme Court. In the circumstances, permitting the leave applications to be converted into appeals and so on, the Service Tribunal's order was set aside and the appellants individually and separately investigating merit in accordance with the law. Remanded to re-dispose of service tribunal appeals, Supreme Court ruled that the Supreme Court further held that the decision rendered by the Supreme Court should be enforced spiritually and in accordance with the binding of the service tribunal And he has also directed that the appellants recover the present judgment of the Supreme Court two months later. Be dealt with within.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Phagwar lawyer