Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ZAFAR IQBAL versus SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, LAHORE

Punjab Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1975 R4 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), for the unauthorized payment of refuse vouchers to the employees who were deprived of employment and, if it was found to be a major felony offense. Action against dismissal of government employment. His dismissal was banned from being a public servant record for more than 36 years of impeccable service, and it was the first case of negligence that a competent officer had taken notice that any male REA official The employee was not named and they were of the opinion. The mistake, if any, was due to excessive work of a public servant, the authorized teacher also noted that no criminal interference was found by the public servant, but said the authority The facts were not appreciated by those who proceeded to impose a heavy dismissal sentence. Jw.org en Only civil servants were convicted of negligence and negligence on public servants en Provided by the Legislature as a basis for fines under the Punjab Civil Servants (Qualification and Discipline) Rules, 1975, on behalf of a civil servant. None of the disqualifications were employed against a civil servant, but in any case would be ineligible because of a public servant. The dismissal orders were set aside against the extremely low penalty of dismissal from the employee and the government employee was instructed to reinstate. famous lower court advocate from Gojra lawyer