MUHAMTNAD ASHRAF versus DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GUJRANWALA
The District Magistrate's arrest and detention jurisdiction was granted by the District Magistrate on the basis of sections 3 and 26 of the West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance 1960, on the basis that the dispute arose as a pre-approval of the order by the District Magistrate. Cannot be granted under section 3 without. )) The restoration of the Western Pakistan of the Public Order Ordinance was not routinely approved by the 1960 District Magistrate against the accused, but it was approved after the satisfaction that the arrest and detention of the accused was necessary in these circumstances. The defendant could not prove that the District Magistrate failed to order and that his arrest and detention had acted in a serious way, the District Magistrate, who was assigned the powers of the Government under Section 26 of the West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance, 1960 Were able to pass an arrest and detention order under section 3 of the ordinance, But even without this reference. The government especially when it was not charged that the district magistrate said that the orders worked well.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
