Find a Lawyer

WALI MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 Testimony of Evidence Although the incident was brought before the accused's house, it was not possible that the accused could have known that the accused had to go through his house at the time of the incident. What happened earlier was between the victim and the accused. This case was not proved on record, the trial court remarked in its ruling that the two sides did not approach the court with open hands, after the legal proceedings in the FIR, the position taken by the prosecution was changed. Yes, after receiving a Medico legal report, it was alleged by prosecutors that it was not credible that the injury to the head of the deceased proved fatal, while the remaining injuries were not painful when the incident occurred. The possibility of provocation by the accused cannot be ruled out at S The incident occurred in front of the house. The conviction for the accused was changed from section 302 (b), PPC to section 302 (c), PPC and PE for seven years for which the accused was behind bars. It was deemed sufficient to conclude that the trial court had also set aside the sentence awarded to the accused and the accused was ordered to be released soon. famous supreme court advocate from Buchay Key lawyer