Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD YOUSUF versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/148/149/109, the accused were not named in the FIR because the injured were legally Fodder witnesses were not involved. Additional criminal convictions allegedly made by the accused in connection with the crime were jointly made which were not admissible in evidence and, at the same time, it was of a very weak nature. I didn't have any specific details. It was never enough to allow the accused himself to positively attach the valuable and explicit value of the evidence submitted by the prosecution, which can only be determined at trial. As further investigations were made under section 497 (2), CCP Bell was allowed to be charged under the circumstances.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous lower court advocate from Talagang lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.