MUHAMMAD YOUSUF versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/148/149/109, the accused were not named in the FIR because the injured were legally Fodder witnesses were not involved. Additional criminal convictions allegedly made by the accused in connection with the crime were jointly made which were not admissible in evidence and, at the same time, it was of a very weak nature. I didn't have any specific details. It was never enough to allow the accused himself to positively attach the valuable and explicit value of the evidence submitted by the prosecution, which can only be determined at trial. As further investigations were made under section 497 (2), CCP Bell was allowed to be charged under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Kotla lawyer
