Find a Lawyer

ISHAQUE versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 5 365/3434 Definition of Evidence Two alleged abductors filed two contradictions by the complainant in connection with the identification of the alleged abductors and the alleged abductor and alleged that they resided in the same village. The accused was his neighbor while the complainant, who was the father, allegedly denied the alleged kidnappers and other prosecution witnesses that he knew the suspect before the incident, in which case, the complainant's reputation was very suspicious and he was a liar. Because of the testimony, the credibility of the other witness of the prosecution could not be ascertained which was also alleged Was. Being a kidnapper, the mystery was also rooted in him and because of this he could not be trusted that he had deposed that he knew the accused before the incident, the buyer did not disclose his name to the police. And the accused were not named in the FIR, rely on the evidence of such a false witness, the only evidence against the co-accused was the identity test which was suspected. After identifying the witnesses, the accused proved the case. The accused was given no role in the prosecution for failing to do so, giving him the benefit of the doubt and acquitted him. Was. registration advocate from Feroz Watan lawyer