Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AHSAN versus ALTAF HUSSAIN

Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act 1973 Sections 41 and 54 Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Rules 1976, 8 134 A Notice of Release has been issued by the High Court of Lawyers for two lawyers sharing the same premises or the same law firm and two different Confirm the parties to each other. On the basis of the interest-bearing commercial property, the lawyer filed a written statement on the specific performance of the sale agreement by the accused, and so the case was ordered that the defendant was a resident of another city and abroad. Had just received such a written statement. Instead of referring the case to the Bar Council through misrepresentation and forgery, the High Court issued a showcase notice to the accused lawyer, the High Court did not accept the valid statement of the testimony because it appears that the witness was able to save her skin. Have made such a statement. And there was no specific rule in the legal practitioners and bar councils R Ules, explaining the conduct of the partners of the same law firm, or co-attorneys in the same office, in 1976, the High Court observed that the time was now In such a situation, there should be rules governing the conduct of lawyers who wanted the High Court to update the Provincial Bar Council and the Pakistan Bar Council to update the professional conduct and ethics of advocates. Serious and sincere efforts should be made to bring in the scope of the case, however, a stern warning was issued to the accused's lawyer. Yes and the showcase notice was reissued. The situation is called famous lower court advocate from Jandanwala lawyer