EJAZ AHMED versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 (1), Third Proviso Panel Code (XLV of 1860, Section 302 7 Reel being Legal, Delay: After Receipt by High Court Accused, Over Legal Period Was in custody (which expired) because the long and delays were not meaningful, after the remand of his case by the High Court, the detention of the accused in jail without any trial and his imprisonment. Keeping it in the rat, until a recent trial for its rights guarantees the prejudice of Tea by the third provision to 49 4970), the PC under s. 49 above. Submitted a guaranteed grant under 7, the CCP was not arbitrary and the accused tea was admitted to bail if it was available under the law. Under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Murree lawyer