Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RASOOL versus AHMAD

On the issue of meeting the reduction of judicial fees due to the reduction of judicial fees, sections 4 and 15 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913, the trial court ordered that such reduction be met but the amount of reduction was explained. Failed to recognize, however, that the earlier umpire's superior right to acquiesce had rejected the suit on the basis of meeting the deficiency on the due date and was not earlier than the same date as the appellate court appealed. I reversed the results I found and reviewed the validity. Judgment fee and jurisdiction were not determined by the trial court, although the trial court's order was not complied with, even if the trial court's order was not complied with. An extension is requested within a day before. Judicial Fee is facing a reduction as the Court Fee was not available even though no order had been approved on this request yet the Judicial Fee was accepted in the presence of another PA. rty Without any objection, the trial court's findings on the issue of judicial fees were reversed by the lower appellate court, respectively. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Mehmood Kot lawyer