Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ZAMAN versus STATE

Criminal Police Investigating the Criminal Case Submission of Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Sections 561A, 156 and 173 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Supplementary Invoice and Re-Investigation Order Kee and the suspects were found to be the main culprits and the challan was filed against them. After submitting the challan, a Range Crime Investigation Officer filed a re-investigation of the case, finding the accused innocent and re-investigating. The original culprit was the third person not named in the FIR. Submission of the crime branch at the request of the applicant, who had in fact confirmed the investigation by the local police in which the accused was the real culprit, then requested a bail before the third person to prove the crime. Was approved and the accused also filed a petition. During the hearing of the request for bail, the trial court, while directing Section H, ordered that the order to render a supplementary invoice against that third person be proved to be the original accused. After presenting the invoice against the accused, the court should be told that the accused are the real culprit. Section H had no jurisdiction to instruct and prepare a subpoena against the third person when the police had already completed an investigation which found that the accused persons were required to record the required evidence. The latter is the real accused of the trial court, can advertise whether the third person was also sought as the accused, but the law asked the trial court law firms from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer