Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHAFFAR versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 Testimony of Evidence All the eye witnesses who were the victim's father and real brother were declared contempt of court and were not confronted with their previous statements, which are listed under 5 161, CCP. The statement of only the eyewitness, who was a woman and who has not been declared, will not be considered safe to maintain the punishment for killing the enemy, as he has given in the FIR A new story was introduced to overlook the prosecution's story and secondly that its statement was not substantiated by any other material situation. Ni crime guns recovered. The recovery itself was suspected, according to witnesses who were not named as witnesses, the accused was arrested on the spot while according to the investigating officer, he was arrested shortly after the incident and the cause. He had recovered a blood-stained knife statement. The enmity of an eyewitness who was not declared and failed in any independent circumstances, extending the credibility of the witness to the sole testimony and proving the crime to be an unlawful indictment. But it would be insecure. advocates from Rajanpur lawyer