Find a Lawyer

I.-G. POLICE, PUNJAB versus YOUSUF HAROBN

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Rr 12 15 & 12 16 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972) Section 3 Appointment of Police Inspectors Recommended Appointment of Candidates for Appointment of Candidates in Medical Standard Inspectors, Written On the complaint against the candidates after the oral test and interview that they had manipulated the exam after obtaining a false certificate in respect of the physical standards prescribed by the Medical Officer, a board was constituted in which the Deputy Inspector. The general police, superintendent included. Candidates were examined by the Board for inquiry into the case of the Police and Medical Superintendent and their height and chest were cut off and the Board sent its operations to the Government for necessary action. The proceedings were challenged by the candidates in the constitutional petition before the High Court, which was accepted by the High Court Constitution of Revenue. The arbitrators / candidates considered in the appeal court stated that police rules, RR 12 15, 12 16 and 12 of 1934 Under 17, it was the health officer's job to measure the height / chest of the candidates and with the authority of the police authority. It was outside to review it. Rule 12 16 of the Police Rules, 1934, gave the superintendent of police the power to reject a candidate whose physical and intellectual quality was unsatisfactory and did not conform to the standards set by the Police Rules, 834 percent of 1934. , Under which the police authority was assessed at its sole discretion. The quality of candidates, medical officers were not the only authority to measure the height and chest of the candidates and the competent authority medi online advocate from Jhudo lawyer