Find a Lawyer

BENAZIR BHUTTO versus THE STATE

Corruption and Corruption Charges in Section 3, 10 and 12 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Sections 265A to 265N & 342 of the Code of Conduct Reference Procedure Determination Stage Procedure Documented by Question Confession of Documents or Oral Evidence About the admissibility of evidence given in the evidence, if it has been objected to by the accused, he or she may decide by the court at the time of receipt of the document through evidence or any other court. At this stage he may be postponed, it is alleged that he will enter. This defense is not in regard to any evidence presented by the prosecution or the prosecution in any way, but in regard to the circumstances and points in the evidence of the prosecution against the accused to which his attention has been drawn. Section 2342, the question of one's confession in CR PC, therefore, relates to the fragment of evidence presented by the prosecution at trial, to the conviction or acquittal of the accused. Used in a case based on such evidence, if the defendant objected to the confession of any document or oral evidence against him in this case, he is free to press the objection before the court at the stage of the argument which Will be resolved However, under no law is it entitled to demand the deferment of the defense in this case unless the question submitted by the prosecutor for the admission of oral documents or oral evidence Without the question of its approval, the documents presented by the prosecution were determined, the accused could not be asked to enter his defense, he was repulsed. best advocate from Liaquat Pur lawyer