Find a Lawyer

ISHRAT YAR KHAN versus ABDUL REHMAN

The Cantonment Rent Restriction Act 1963 Section 17 Bonafide Landlord's Personal Needs, a retired headmaster stated on oath that he had built his own residential home along with the garage and to pay the loan received to the garage. The store was rented. After paying for the House Building Finance Corporation and the loan, he wanted to return the premises for his personal use for safe parking of his car. Such a statement of the landlord was not altered or effectively denied in defense, but the statements contained in the statement were supported. There was nothing available to suggest that the witnesses examined by the tenant, who was part of the shop landlord's residential home and also owned a vehicle, suggested that the landlord was the landlord. Is not an integral part of the residential area. One owned the car and the question in the shop was actually a garage, so, he was in favor of using the premises as Ag .And as such it cannot be said that the landlord Was not meant to promote personal need immigration advocates contact from FR Tank / DI Khan lawyer