Find a Lawyer

HAQ NAWAZ versus STATE

Law Evidence Order 1984 Article 41 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898) Section 164 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 and 120B Evidence Examination In addition to two other eyewitnesses mentioned in the FIR, the injured witness or the FIR The absence of other witnesses named did not result in prosecution because the prosecutor was not obliged to examine all the witnesses in the case in which the accused was arrested. A few minutes after the incident and he was immediately designated in the FIR, the person who fired at the deceased was not required to hold an identification parade, especially when the complainant filed an FIR Both in the IR and before it had a positive claim by the court that it had identified the accused as the perpetrator. The trial did not conclude that it was unnecessary, which was proved not only by the evidence, but also for the recovery of the weapons of the accused from the possession of the accused and the evacuation of the premises which matched each other. The reliance on ocular testimony on the accused by the High Court could not invalidate the entire testimony and the conviction was upheld. jobs for advocates from Kandiaro lawyer