MUHAMMAD SHAFI versus S.H.O., POLICE STATION TIBBA SULTANPUR, TEHSIL MAILSI,-DISTRICT VEHARI
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 561 A Penal Code (XLV of 1860), section 379/411 The dismissal of the prosecution was that they had forcibly raised the cotton crop from the land of the complainant. Land was occupied. As the tenants and farmers, the complainant and the farmers who harvested the crops were cut off like tenants, if the tenant was accused of being a tenant, he would have taken the produce to the complainant / landlord without paying the share of the rent. Yes, he did not commit any fine if he did not pay the harvest. The Assistant Collector or the Collector can decide the duty of the landlord / landlord to recover his or her value under the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887 and not the tenancy tribunal under section 9379/1111. The PPC has been ordered to be dismissed under circumstances by filing proceedings against the accused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Chak Jamal lawyer
