Find a Lawyer

NADEEM SARWAR versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION, SADAR, HAFIZABAD

Pakistan Penal Code Section 279/322 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Sections 154 and 156 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition charged with charging FPR with section of applicant / section 279 against applicant. Enter FIR under /. 322, the PPC, through a constitutional petition, claimed that Article 322, the PPC, should be ordered to be removed from the F1R, as stated that it was not attracted to the facts alleged in the FIRR. That involves inserting or deleting any part of a constitutional law. Using its constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), the High Court had no duty in column no.3 of the FIR; in such a situation all that was required was that the accused Investigation Officer It was agreed that a specific time could be entered in the FIR. It should not be pressed because the allegations contained in the statement section of the FIR were not attracted to the original FIR, but not the column number. S1 to 5 which was to be filled up by a mohair or other police officer, a similar objection was made not only to the Investigation Officer, but also to the court for dealing with his bail application or hearing his case. Can be lifted up front. Interrupting the turmoil at such a stage in the High Court law firms from Kunri lawyer