MUHAMMAD YAR versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Sections 279/322 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Sections 154 and 156 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application relating to charging section of the PPC with F1R Following the charges / petitioner FPR was filed under Section 927/322 322, under the constitutional petition, it was requested that Section 222222, PPC be ordered to be removed from F1R. Because it was stated that the section was not attracted to the facts alleged in the FIR. Using the constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), a constitutional law in Article No. 3 of the FIR was not the work of the High Court. In such a situation, it was required that the investigating officer had to convince that a specific clause could not be filed against him because the allegations contained in the statement section of the FIR were not attracted to the original FIR. The statement was part of the FIR and not T-Columns No 1 to 5 which were to be filled up by a mohair or other police officer, a similar objection not only to the Investigation Officer, but also to the court. A constitutional request can be heard to deal with a bail application or a trial. Do not lie to the High Court to interfere with the turmoil at such a stage
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Machi Goth lawyer