ALLAH WASAYA versus STATE
The appraisal of evidence by Pakistan Panel Code Sections 302/34 and 304, Part I was quite natural at that point and despite long cross-examination, their testimony could not be broken by the defense as it was related to the witnesses. Due to the false involvement of the accused cannot be expected. Both sides were affirmed with the medical evidence from the ocular testimony, however, the sequence of events showed that the incident was a sudden outburst of anger, with no prior convictions on the spot, and they were charged with the crime. Had taken up arms. Without sharing any common intention to kill the deceased from there it did not seem that at this time there was even a common intention between them that the question of ridiculous liability was, therefore, in section 2302 /. Under 34, the culprits of the accused were not punished; PPC was changed under the conditions of Section 304, Part I, PPC and accordingly their sentences were reduced.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Karachi lawyer