Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 and 324 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) did not support the sudden provocation from the grave and the absence of the same eye witnesses named in the FIR did not result because the prosecution Was not obliged to investigate. All of the victim's father's trial court witnesses filed an FIR immediately, and it is not to be expected that the victim's father is responsible for the murder of the son's son, Ocholler, with the real culprit. Was made. And all the material aspects of the case were confirmed by the injured witness, whose presence could not be doubted. The prosecution's case was further reinforced by the report of the forensic science laboratory, which according to the case has been matched with safe spaces. The accused fired a pistol at the accused's notice, fired two bullets at the accused and two bullets at the injured witness. The fifth bullet was lost and he was not yet arguing with the same person who picked up a case and left his head on the wrong side. He stabbed him twice and thus brutally committed the murder and did not deserve any relaxation and punishment. He was retained and his leave to appeal was not granted best law firm from Kumbh lawyer