Find a Lawyer

RASOOL BAKHSH versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 (b) West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), section 13E, no doubt in the investigation of the evidence, the accused confessed to the crime, was registered by the police almost ten days after his arrest. , But that was not contradicted by other evidence of the prosecution and can still be relied upon when it was said that the confession was confirmed by the crime scene from the scene of the incident and that the accused was shot on the occasion of recovery. The gun fired was not confirmed in the incident. By an independent witness required under Section 103, CRPC, but it merely formed a rule of procedure and did not rely on the evidence and evidence of a police officer in the absence of an easy purchase of independent witnesses. can go. According to a report by the Ballistic Express, the bodies were fired from a gun recovered at the behest of the accused. Medical evidence also supported the prosecution's case. It did not indicate in the case that the crime had been committed under the Act. Naqis Mutofi was not subjected to any provocation, he could not be convicted on the land of Seary due to the alleged murder and should have been convicted of such charges. In the absence of death cases, the accused was already treated mildly and given less life imprisonment. The confession by the accused was voluntary and the convictions were punished. Was retained. when you need a advocate from Naukot lawyer