CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, LAHORE versus SIANA BANO
Section 279/322 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Sections 154 and 156 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Section 279 / against the accused / applicants excluded from charging the section of PPC with the FCR. 322, file an FIR under PPC. It was registered that through a constitutional petition, it was requested that section 322, PPC be ordered to be removed from the F1R as stated in column no.3 to insert or delete any part of the Penal Code. Was not attracted to the facts contained in the FIRR governing the act. Using its constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan, the work of the FIR was not the work of the High Court (1973) In such a situation, all that was required was to convince the Investigation Officer that the F. A specific section in the IR could not be suppressed. He was also not attracted to the allegations contained in the statement section of the FIR, which was a part of the original FIR FIR, not columns 1-1 of such an objection not only to the investigating officer, but also to the court. Even before his bail plea or before his trial, he would not lie to the High Court to intervene, a similar objection was to be filed by a Muharram or other police officer. In such stages of turmoil
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Depal Pur lawyer