ANNETTA HAROON versus SUGHRAN BIBI
West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance 1959 Sections 13 and 2 (c) (i) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Keeping the relationship between the landlord and the tenant in the process of withdrawal applicant / tenant landlord and tenant Dard denied the relationship between the parties, alleging that the sale agreement in connection with the dispute between the applicant and the other co-owner of the premises was stated and that the sale agreement was pending, Withdrawal proceedings were stopped because of suit under the specific performance of the rental control company. In the constitutional petition, the rental controller's contract order was set aside by the High Court. The legitimate applicant / tenant did not claim any contract with the respondents / landlord, but had claimed the contract with the other partners but stated that the sale contract could not suspend the tenancy. Or remove the jurisdiction of the rent controller to entertain and decide the removal request in the High Court, it was okay to validate the rent controller's order under which the withdrawal proceedings were stopped, the patent jurisdictional Mistaken
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Kurram lawyer