ZAHOOR AHMED versus RUKHSANA KAUSAR
The Guardians and Wards Act 1890 Section 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) sought the custody of a minor who was living with his grandfather's father who had left two children with him. Had a second marriage contract with, worked overseas and did not appear to make himself available for cross-examination under the circumstances of his residence abroad, so that the court could decide whether to make the decision. Whether the minor's welfare was in his custody or not, the minor was summoned to the High Court, after which he was examined. Informed the court that he was happily living with Mamma Nana and had no desire to go to his father. The High Court had disclosed the facts that the minor's father had made a similar request for the custody of the minor. Filed The response to the petition filed for the grant of a minor's father's care was during the proceedings before the hearing forum and the High Court saying it was financed. It is better to act as a human being and be able to afford a better education to his minor son because one father and mother have contracted the other marriage and five children from his new marriage will be able to properly handle his minor son. Nourish and educate. However, the two courts below reached a conclusive conclusion that as far as the financial status of the two families was concerned, they were almost equal. The High Court found that the father was working abroad because the worker was likely to be someone Can't keep a competent person in their custody. Indirectly of the minor
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Noor kot lawyer