MUHAMMAD RAFIQ GILL, DIRECTOR, ESTABLISHMENT MANAGEMENT, FAISALABADDEVELOPMENTAUTHORITY,FAISALABAD versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB
Punjab Civil Servants (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1975 R4 The Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), the punishment for withholding Section 4 publicity, is a public servant who was a Deputy Commissioner and headed the District Recruitment Committee. The charges were filed against them. In the process of appointing certain positions, the officer authorized to report the irregularities in the inquiry officer said that the government employees mechanically amended their first order and after issuing notice to the civil servant and providing opportunity for hearing Imposed a small fine on the restraint. , Withdrew the earlier conviction and was given a clear sentence that was stopped by the witnesses who had stopped the development of a public servant for a period of two years or earlier by the retired officer. The recruitment committee meeting was held, candidates were interviewed regularly, recommendations were made. And when needed, there was nothing to justify the inquiry officer's finding that allegations against public servants were proved, the authorized officer did not have the law to disregard his first order and issue a notice. Pass a new order to impose another fine on the civil servant without and without confirming its chances. The order imposing penalties on civil servants was, in the circumstances, set aside
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Dera Bugti lawyer