JUMMA KHAN versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 377 Crimes of Enforcement (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 12 Guarantees no enmity between the two parties, the accused in the trial. There was a false interference. The delay in filing the FIR was sufficiently explained; the victim, a 9-10 year old child, could not expect to go to the police station with some elderly person like his father who was not present at the house. There was a basis for linking the accused to the alleged offense which came under the prohibition clause of section 497 (1), CCP Bell was denied the accused under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Landi Kotal lawyer
