Find a Lawyer

RAZIA SULTANA, LECTURER versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, PESHAWAR UNIVERSITY, PESHAWAR

Section 11 (c) of the University of Peshawar Service Constitution 1977, under section 11 (c) of the University of Peshawar Service Statutes, 1977, was authorized to extend the investigation period of the employees for two more years, although the University of Peshawar The Service was authorized under Section 11 (c) of the Constitution. But given that the extension is bound to take effect immediately upon the completion of the first probation period, there was no provision in the constitution to extend the extension of the period to the preceding effect. As employees have completed their first probationary period, they have further expanded. In the dedicated phase, the trial period will be illegal in Articles 11, 12, 13 and 23 of the Inquiry Committee Inquiry Committee, the constitution of which the Constitution was taken by the employee, was constituted to investigate any disciplinary matter. Nor was there any show to watch. Employees have been given notice through any notice of allegations of misconduct, but the Committee's objection was to ascertain the facts relating to the allegations and retaliation charges made by the employees against the co-employee and vice versa and inquiry. The domain was limited to the extent that the inquiry committee was not formed under the laws of the university, but wars that were designed to be friendly between two employees. In a university where no such inquiry committee or body was set up to refrain from employees' finding of guilt or innocence, but the mission of finding the facts was restricted, its reports were merely recommendations and against which no Do not take disciplinary action best advocate from Kharian lawyer