ARDESHIR COWASJEE versus K.B.C.A
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 2A, 3, 4, 37 and 199 ??? Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 151 ?? Constitutional petition ??? High Court bench accused of bias ??? Applicant raised objections to hearing the case by the High Court Bench which some parties commented on and admired on the judges of the bench based on some articles published in the newspapers? Sworn to work strictly according to the law, and the constitution was not so critical of the Constitution's remarks, when a lawyer himself made this statement, could the opposition party's maid have concerns? As to whether such comment was contemptuous of the court or whether the applicant as a journalist had the right to comment on public concern matters, the High Court strongly rejected it. ??? The High Court observed that whenever such applicant has to approach the court, the rest of the public? By and large, such applicants should have shown restraint and refrained from making any comments about the conduct of the individual judge.? It has to be ensured that the trust of the people in the institutions of justice delivery is of the utmost importance, regardless of the individual. Such offices, were not disabled? Any hopes or fears about the possibility or expectation of a particular decision from a particular bench of the High Court have to be removed and the justice as per law can be conveyed by any bench of the High Court. ??? The High Court, while maintaining the public's confidence in the justice system in the wider interest of justice, decided that the bench would not hear the case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Ranipur lawyer