Find a Lawyer

SONO KHAN versus SIKANDER

The Sessions Court considered this fact at the hearing of the plea of section 497 (5) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), the grounds for the cancellation of the bail that no recovery was effective from the accused in this case. The accused was shown as a fugitive at the time of issuing the invoice, but did not talk about such fateful consequences for accepting bail or denying bail, the accused handed over to the Medical Expert. Without a doubt, it was his opinion of being a disabled person and unable to commit a crime, which was unnecessary and the complainant was very concerned about the bail. The same prejudice, which was illegal and in fact wrong, can be called regardless of whether the accused has misused the privilege of bail, since the accused is charged with such unlawful action. Could not be excluded from subsequent operations. il the request to grant bail was revoked in circumstances famous supreme court advocate from Khandabad lawyer