Find a Lawyer

HUBDAR ALI ABBASI versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Articles 439 and 561A of the Sindh Children Act (XII of 1955), Sections 4, 10, 65 and 68 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), 5302 sued by the Juvenile Court Age Determination That under this age of 16, the trial was to be carried out separately as provided under section 10, the Sindh Children Act 1955, the trial court has dismissed the accused under this opinion. The suspect's school leaving certificate was not the definitive proof of age against medical opinion, the radiologist said in issuing a virtual school dropout certificate It is reported that the accused was under 16 years of age at the time of the alleged incident. The school leaving certificate which the accused claimed to be the minor was supported not only by the matriculation certificate but also by the admission card used in the examination hall. ? All of these documents belonged to the relevant Board of Education and were prepared long before the commission of the alleged crime in the absence of fraud or manipulation charges, according to the prosecution statement, to indicate the exact age of the accused. Cannot disregard document. Based on the radiologist's report, the medical opinion showed the age of the accused at the time of the incident, when the crime was proved for sixteen years and four months, when the crime was committed and the child was arrested. The young man was entitled to trial by the court Pakistan, top advocate family court from Sohawa District Daska lawyer