The Convene Evidence Order 1984 Article 114 estoppel referee was appointed with the consent of the parties, and the trial court decided the case in light of the referee's lower appellate court statement, as well as the high court's decision of the appellant of the trial court. Maintained. The nature of the effectiveness and the nature of the referee's statement is binding where the appellant appoints such referee with his free consent to the decision in the matter and agrees that whichever decision the referee gives will be binding on him and He will not challenge its authenticity. And the appellant failed to challenge the statement of the referee through a cross-examination or request for written objection, then it was evident that his conduct allowed the appellant to raise any objection to such decision. Cannot be given so that the effectiveness can be challenged. And the Supreme Court refused to interfere with the purpose of binding the referee's statement.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
