FAZALUR REHMAN versus THE STATE
Constitution Pakistan 1973 Section 302/307 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The ocular testimony presented by the prosecution witnesses was permanent and they affirmed each other on all material aspects of the prosecution's case. That the witnesses were kept as true witnesses. The record proved that the suspect, armed with a pistol, had arrived at the scene of the incident and had fired two fatal shots at the victim, one was on a makeshift area and the other was in the stomach of close range shots that proved the victim. Was extracted with the intent to kill. The eyewitnesses, who were also injured at the scene of the incident, cannot be doubted. The eyewitnesses who testified were correct and despite the investigation, the accused failed to prove anything on the record, to show that they were not present on the spot and did not see the motive and medical evidence. Also testified to the ocular testimony that the accused's motive was also long gone. To prove his guilt, the accused must be convicted and no case of interference by the Supreme Court should be dismissed, for appeal. Holiday request dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Pasni lawyer