SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB (C&W) versus IKRAMULLAH
Article 13 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 212 (3) Exempts authorized penalties for increase in penalties, extension of fine by the competent authority without giving any reasons for agreeing to the report of the inquiry committee. Specific responsibility was imposed by their department (applicant) against the undue influence of respondents by the department (applicant), the inquiry committee recommended the award of minor convictions, with which the competent authority Did not agree with this, awarding the defendants huge fines. The hearing of the appeals filed by the respondents before the services tribunal and the convictions imposed on them by the department was reduced to the point that the allegations against the defendants' officers were serious and they raised the state treasury huge. Was damaged, and it was with the competent authority. Power under section 13 to award penalties to the Punjab Employees' Competency, Discipline and Accountability Act, 2006, as was done in the present case, in the light of the evidence recorded by the legitimate inquiry committee during its inquiry. I discussed the role attributed to the plaintiffs, and they came to the conclusion that some of the allegations were proved, while others were either partially proved or passed to any competent authority for any reason. By agreeing to the evidence submitted by the Inquiry Committee without assigning, the penalty increased and so on. Was changed. The major fines where the competent authority had proposed to increase the fines were collected during the allegations and inquiries made by them.
