Find a Lawyer

ANWAR ZAMAN versus CHIEF EXECUTIVE, BANNU WOOLLEN MILLS LTD., BANNU

Employee of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, requesting a complaint for termination of service from section 22A (8) (G), 22D, 22E and 25 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance under section 22A (8) (G). Referred to the National Industrial Relations Commission, 1969, which was dismissed by the Commission after a proper inquiry upon the Commission's dismissal, filed a complaint before the Labor Court under Section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 , Which was rejected by the Labor Court on the grounds that it was again targeted by the principle of justice. A similar request was already dismissed by the National Industrial Relations Commission's endorsement, after the application was dismissed by the National Industrial Relations Commission, against the dismissal under section 22D of the Employee Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 Appeal can be filed, but the employee resented the right to appeal rather than benefit from labor. For the same relief which the Court had already denied by the Industrial Industrial Realty, under the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, the order of the National Industrial Relations Commission, to obtain a final form, said that no Neither can the question be raised in front of a court or authority complaint, then filed by the employees, was not authorized. Under the circumstances property advocate from Taxila lawyer