MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus STATE
Adultery (Enforcement Hoodo) Ordinance 1979 Section 497 Adultery (Enforcement Hoodoo) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 11 Bail, was the husband of a co-accused at the time of filing an FIR in the grant that he had known about his wife I thought. / The co-accused was kidnapped by the accused, but during the interrogation it was affected that his wife / co-accused had developed illicit relations with the accused and fled voluntarily. The defendant was unable to provide a reasonable explanation as to why he should. Was wrongly involved in this case. The defendant's conduct was not one of the reasons for which he could be eligible for a bail exception
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Mirpur Khas lawyer