THE STATE versus MANSOOR-UR-REHMAN KHAN AFRIDI
The contempt of court Act 1976 section 3 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 204 without the permission of the court, the registration of the second constitutional petition and the wrong number of the previous application were issued notices to the tender 7 adviser by the suspects and both the applicant. On the basis that the claimants had earlier dismissed the constitutional petition and the applicant filed another petition through the same lawyer to file the fresh petition without any court permission. The exact number was not mentioned. The Impact Council did not work within the scope of the ethics profession and committed actions that clearly fell within the scope of contempt of court, furthermore, the applicant was the beneficiary and an active participant in such action. Yes, both the lawyer and the applicant were found guilty of contempt. In keeping with the rule of healthy relationships, the court was also exempted from the lower sentence of abortion, according to the same bench and bar lawyer's position in the profession, after consolidation, the applicant was also subjected, Under the contempt of court petition was also decided
best advocate from Village Sunder lawyer
