MUKHTAR HUSSAIN versus A.K GOVRNMENT
The High Court Establishment (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules 1974 CL (20) Amendment to the Law Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Intra Court's Appellate Exempt Appellant, without taking the first opportunity to appear before the Appellate Authority, The constitutional petition was dismissed and the appellant filed an intra-court appeal against the decision. The appellant could not file an appeal before the appellate authority because it was filed before the appellate authority, keeping in view the fact that the dispute between the competent authority was not resolved. The ordinance, in 1972, clearly provided that if an application before the High Court arises from an action in which the applicable law has provided at least one appeal (or a revision or a revision), the intra-court appeal This would not be possible regardless of the fact that even though the appellant could not file the departments for not filing their representation This appeal, an intra-court appeal filed by him, was not eligible
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Sohawa District Jelum lawyer