Find a Lawyer

ABDUS SALAM versus HASSAN DIN

The CPC appearance and non-submission of the Civil Procedure Code Order IX, O IX, R 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition passed, dismissed and satisfied by the trial court in 1970 Wind. In the 1971 1971 execution, when this property was auctioned in the enforcement proceedings, the applicants who had purchased the suit property in 1973 and made material changes in the same substance, the respondent in 1975 against the former. Parsis knew of the decree, but did not bother to approach the court for information on whether a decree was passed against him or not, the trial court filed in 1978 by the plaintiff. On the basis of application, this decision was declared invalid. The lower appellate court upheld the trial court's decision. Although the lower appellate court acknowledged that the defendant knew of the trial, the court still upheld the review holding that the timeline for the petition to reject the injunction filed by the defendant was timely. Was imposed. Both the courts neither verified the material available on the record nor the evidence provided by the parties, nor applied the judicial mind, and the court simply ignored the governing body on which the following. The inquiries of both the courts were based on misrepresentation of evidence and were against the provisions of the law order of the two courts which were allowed to apply under it. power of attorney advocate Mehar lawyer