HABIB & SONS GOVERNMENT CONTRACTORS versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W. F. P.
Section 96, O VII, R 11 and O VI, R 6 Arbitration Act (X of 1940), section 34 suit title and the effect of the agreement in the declaration of receipt in relation to non-maintenance of the suit in terms of arbitration The object was not raised. The contract clause was rejected under OVII, read with R 11 and VI, R 6, CPC, failure to comply with the arbitration clause of this agreement is valid for failure, it was for the respondents Prior to filing a request for a breach of the arbitration clause of the agreement and a factually written statement, they should have raised the required objection under Section 34, the Arbitration Act, 1940, before the appropriate applicants could move the appropriate request and file a written statement. Can stop the trial. The opportunity was lost, the trial court's decisions and orders were set aside and sent to the trial court to deal with the case law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Parachinar lawyer
