Find a Lawyer

GULNAZ BIBI versus RAFAQAT ALI SHAH

Guardians and Wards Act 1890 Sections 17 and 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for custody of minors was terminated upon the marriage of the parents of the minor and the minor was living with the father. There was a long list of thei elkol and criminal cases in which he was facing trial. The father had neither the means of income nor the property he owned. The mother was a graduate in a good quality school and a The teacher was and was living a respectable life and there she was. There is nothing in the record to indicate that she is a woman of bad character. The petition for the appointment of guardian filed by the father was dismissed by the Guardian Judge, while the lower appellate court also accepted it on appeal. The father argued that the marriage contract with the mother had been made. While dealing with such a plea, the court had to pass its findings on the terms of Sections 17 and 25 of the Gardens and Wards Act, 1890, when dealing with such a request, the basic values for the appointment and custody of the guardian were alien to the minor. , Was not to be exercised in favor of the parents in the interest and control of the children. The interests and benefits of parents but for their own interests and well-being, the father, although a natural guardian, still had this right under the welfare of the minor, the welfare of the lower appellate court. Failure to consider the basic standard was that the juveniles did not disqualify them for the sake of their children in the case of the mother's remarriage while dealing with the appeal filed by the father and divorce advocates from Khurian wala lawyer