COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX versus SATTANDAS MOHANDAS SIDHI
Issuance of a notice under Section 636363 for the interests of the Commissioner's revenue jurisdiction. No notice of action is required unless the notice of the officer concerned is signed and the telegram sent by the Commissioner is sealed. Don't be In order to assess how the income from the telegram was prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue Notice, the notice by post order was not substituted; the order of review by the Commissioner was invalid Indian Income Tax Act. 1961, Sections 263 and 282 were passed without providing an opportunity to be heard.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
