Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

NAV NIRMAN (PVT.) LTD versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX


The reduction of fines or the return of waivers has rejected the SC's request for a reduction and waiver of the loss assessing officer, announcing the imposition of a penalty for printing to the Income Commissioner. No penalty action can be initiated when a fine is imposed on the return of a deficit when the Commissioner observes that he failed to cooperate in the recovery proceedings against the record and the Commissioner ordered the Commissioner's unrelated material order. In view of this, the Commissioner has shown negligence by the Commissioner. The Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, is responsible for the repeal of section 271 (4A) [before deletion by the TL (Amendment) Act, 1975, 1 10 of 1975), section 273A (4).

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
patent advocate from Pannu aqil lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.