Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus STATE


The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 definition of evidence in the house where the alleged incident took place did not support the involvement of the prosecution or the accused and the evidence on the record did not encourage trust. And litigation was not endorsed by any other independent witness. Or the persons at the location where the incident allegedly took place were brought to a qualitative record which could have led to an enmity between the parties to the accused on the capital charge and the incident was unseen and The accused was involved. Due to suspicions that had come to the attention of the complaining party and the accused was tried by the trial court, they were set aside and the accused acquitted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Dadu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.