Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

RIAZ AHMED versus THE STATE


The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 accused of defining evidence failed to present any material or circumstance that failed to show that the prosecution's witnesses were unauthorized to the extent that they had made it to the murder case. I would have been falsely implicated; there was no material contradiction in the statements. Through the prosecution's testimony where it can be inferred that the prosecution's witnesses were not telling the truth or their evidence should be dismissed, all the witnesses of the prosecution were subjected to a lengthy cross-examination, but the accused Were unable to extract any material that would indicate the prosecution's witnesses. No witness to the truth Prosecution witnesses successfully cross-examined: The case against the accused proved beyond any doubt that the accused had acted cruelly, was properly sentenced and The sentence was pronounced

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for fresh advocates from Sukkur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.