RIAZ AHMED versus THE STATE
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 accused of defining evidence failed to present any material or circumstance that failed to show that the prosecution's witnesses were unauthorized to the extent that they had made it to the murder case. I would have been falsely implicated; there was no material contradiction in the statements. Through the prosecution's testimony where it can be inferred that the prosecution's witnesses were not telling the truth or their evidence should be dismissed, all the witnesses of the prosecution were subjected to a lengthy cross-examination, but the accused Were unable to extract any material that would indicate the prosecution's witnesses. No witness to the truth Prosecution witnesses successfully cross-examined: The case against the accused proved beyond any doubt that the accused had acted cruelly, was properly sentenced and The sentence was pronounced
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Arifwala lawyer