DIRECTOR GENERAL, NATIONAL SAVINGS, ISLAMABAD versus BALQEES BEGUM
Article 15 of the R15 Public Debt Act, 1944 (Article XVIII), Article 199 Privilege Bond is permitted to present an indemnity bond for holding for a period of six years. Is a ground condition for providing relief under. The Constitution Prize Bond was introduced by 199 respondents after the expiry of the six-year term provided under R15 of the Prize Bonds 1999, but the High Court found in its constitutional jurisdiction the basis of its compassion. But her claim was that she was simple. People living in remote villages had no means of checking whether he had won the prize, and his claim was only banned for four months. The Legality High Court acknowledged that the respondents' claim was inapplicable under the law and that only a compassionate relationship with the judge prevail. The strange circumstances of this case, the sympathy that can be said, are the shadow, the upper hand, and the nexus of the principles of equality. e and the greater influence of the explicit mandate of the law should be considered by the courts in granting relief to the aggrieved party under Article 199 of the Constitution, but when it had any scope in the relevant law, it was undoubtedly a prize. Not through violation of Law 15 of the Bonds Rules, 1999, it was implicitly considered that not only would the federal government's obligation to pay awards be terminated for a very long time, but This is the right of a person / holder. The prize bond will be extinguished. Seed Rule A double to the right of the prize bond holder to receive this amount
