Arts 204 (2) and 184 (3) contempt of court Ordinance (V of 2003), notice of contempt of court contempt of court, failure to comply with Supreme Court directive given in the decision of the Watan Party v. Federation Pakistan (PLD 2011 SC 997) petitioner said that despite the directives of the Supreme Court, the lives of the people in Karachi city cannot be protected in the said decision and there is no respite for the loss of human lives. That the civil administration has failed to improve the situation and thus the Supreme Court directive was deliberately ignored but violated. The directive on the change in the boundaries of the governing units and the delimitation of different constituencies was violated. That the weapons and ammunition instructions of the forbidden and unauthorized sacks was not complied with. That no proper legislation was enacted to take possession of the land, which is a contempt of court. About those who know and are wasting property, about compensation, the deployment of an independent and de-political investigative agency, the creation of a special joint cell, and the collection of records regarding police officers and witnesses, who were killed. These instructions were not. The court was complied with, under the circumstances, Article 204 of the Constitution was directed to read the alleged claimants in accordance with Section 3 of the contempt of court Ordinance, 2003, who were instructed to appear and explain Why not take action? In accordance with the constitution and the law, the judgment of the Vatan Party v. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 2011 SC 997), against the contempt court.
