KARIM BIBI versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER/COLLECTOR, RAHIMYAR KHAN
Sections 10 and 17 of the Government Land Colonization (Punjab) Act, 1912, applicable the principles of natural justice applicable to the respondent to whom the land was allotted, transferred to the appellant through registered exchange deed and appeals. Provided equal area of state land with. The acquisition of such land was canceled by the Board of Revenue without notice or challenged by the appellants in the constitutional petition for the appellant to cancel the order, but the High Court stated that the liminal order approved by the High Court. I was challenged in the intra-court appeal. In addition, the Validity Board of Revenue was terminated without notice or the appellant's knowledge without notice, the principles of natural justice and the High Court were violated by the Board of Revenue's retention, These principles were also ignored where the body of any person or persons was present. Particularly hasty to decide whether to abrogate the Contribution, which has adversely affected a person's property, property or his right, in the absence of any express words in the Act, in favor of the principles of natural justice. Except for use, such power has been provided; the courts have interpreted the power as acting in conjunction with the given power. The duty to act in accordance with the principles of natural justice that can be applied to the facts and circumstances of all such orders of the Board of Revenue and the High Court which maintains the termination of the land without the enforcement or hearing of the appellants as a party. Yes. Could not be sustained
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Kandhkot lawyer