Find a Lawyer

AIJAZ AHMED versus STATE

The accused, in connection with the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 107 and 108 Accountability Ordinance (CXI of 1996), Section 4 (2) Accountability Act (IX of 1997), Section 26, under the Accountability Ordinance, 1996, for the exception of evidence, the unlawful act of the higher authority Was identified. Without using the central suspect's free mind and advancing the joint intent regarding the relevant instructions, rules and regulations records, he did not show that the accused had any financial benefit and What was that It appears to have taken similar action to fulfill the common purpose. No action was taken against the senior officers of the accused involved and the proceedings against the principal accused were terminated because it had illegally violated its The profits received were returned voluntarily. In practice, the perpetrator could not be punished, the property could not be higher than the original accused. Accordingly, the accused was sentenced, but kept up to a fine of Rs. The sentence was reduced to one. jobs for fresh advocates from Feroz Walla lawyer